Dwelling airtightness: A socio-technical evaluation in an Irish context

Derek Sinnott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the relationship between envelope airtightness, correlated energy performance and occupant sensitivity pre- and post-energy efficient fabric upgrading of semi-detached social housing in Ireland. The climate corrected energy impact of the infiltration is derived from standard blower door test results and compared with modelled performance. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the human and indoor environmental quality impact of the upgrading.Testing revealed large variations in airtightness levels and characteristics between similar dwellings. Measured and modelled airtightness results differ by up to 89%. Fabric upgrading not incorporating airtightness improvement measures yielded an average incidental 22% improvement in envelope airtightness. This equates to an estimated average 361 kWh energy savings per annum per dwelling. Occupants were generally pleased with the improvements, but many were unhappy with the ventilation systems installed as part of the upgrading.Airtightness plays an important role in the energy performance and comfort of dwellings. However, this concept is little understood by occupants and often not included as part of upgrading strategies. Further investigation is required to inform and improve energy performance calculation methodologies. There is also a need to consider the impact of upgrading works on comfort. Occupants need to be educated about the benefits of maintaining good ventilation and limiting infiltration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)264-271
Number of pages8
JournalBuilding and Environment
Volume95
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2016

Keywords

  • Airtightness
  • Occupant perceptions
  • Residential
  • Retrofit

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dwelling airtightness: A socio-technical evaluation in an Irish context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this