TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards the mitigation of distributed denial-of-service cyberbioattacks in bacteria-based biosensing systems
AU - López Bernal, Sergio
AU - Perez Martins, Daniel
AU - Huertas Celdrán, Alberto
N1 - Funding Information:
This publication has emanated from research conducted with the financial support of a) Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) and the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine on behalf of the Government of Ireland under Grant Number [ 16/RC/3835 ], b) the Swiss Federal Office for Defense Procurement (armasuisse) with the CyberSpec ( CYD-C-2020003 ) project, and c) the University of Zürich UZH .
Funding Information:
This publication has emanated from research conducted with the financial support of a) Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) and the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine on behalf of the Government of Ireland under Grant Number [16/RC/3835], b) the Swiss Federal Office for Defense Procurement (armasuisse) with the CyberSpec (CYD-C-2020003) project, and c) the University of Z?rich UZH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - In recent years, bacterial populations have been engineered to act as biological sensors able to improve human health by developing novel therapeutics and diagnostics. Nowadays, populations of engineered bacteria can be remotely controlled to perform some medical actions on-demand; however, it brings crucial concerns from the cybersecurity perspective. As an example, one of the first cyberbioattacks has been recently proposed to explore the feasibility of using engineered bacteria to produce a Distributed Denial-of-Service and disrupt the creation of biofilm, a natural protection of bacteria against external agents. With the goal of mitigating the impact of this cyberbioattack, this paper proposes two novel mitigation mechanisms: quorum quenching and amplification. On the one hand, quorum quenching focuses on emitting molecules to block those sent by the cyberbioattack. On the other hand, the amplification approach emits molecules to increase the percentage of those needed to create the biofilm structure. To measure the performance of both mitigation techniques in dynamic scenarios, we have implemented different configurations of the Distributed Denial-of-Service attack and evaluated the channel attenuation and the signal-to-interference-plus-noise (SINR). As a result, we have observed that both approaches reduce the impact caused by the cyberbioattack, detecting differences between them. The quorum quenching mechanism presented better results, although it did not adapt its behavior to different attack configurations, responding statically. In contrast, the amplitude mitigation technique is perfectly adapted to attack configurations with different impacts on biofilm creation.
AB - In recent years, bacterial populations have been engineered to act as biological sensors able to improve human health by developing novel therapeutics and diagnostics. Nowadays, populations of engineered bacteria can be remotely controlled to perform some medical actions on-demand; however, it brings crucial concerns from the cybersecurity perspective. As an example, one of the first cyberbioattacks has been recently proposed to explore the feasibility of using engineered bacteria to produce a Distributed Denial-of-Service and disrupt the creation of biofilm, a natural protection of bacteria against external agents. With the goal of mitigating the impact of this cyberbioattack, this paper proposes two novel mitigation mechanisms: quorum quenching and amplification. On the one hand, quorum quenching focuses on emitting molecules to block those sent by the cyberbioattack. On the other hand, the amplification approach emits molecules to increase the percentage of those needed to create the biofilm structure. To measure the performance of both mitigation techniques in dynamic scenarios, we have implemented different configurations of the Distributed Denial-of-Service attack and evaluated the channel attenuation and the signal-to-interference-plus-noise (SINR). As a result, we have observed that both approaches reduce the impact caused by the cyberbioattack, detecting differences between them. The quorum quenching mechanism presented better results, although it did not adapt its behavior to different attack configurations, responding statically. In contrast, the amplitude mitigation technique is perfectly adapted to attack configurations with different impacts on biofilm creation.
KW - Bacteria
KW - Biofilm
KW - Cyberbiosecurity
KW - DDoS
KW - Engineered cells
KW - Mitigation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115998247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103241
DO - 10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103241
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115998247
SN - 1051-2004
VL - 118
JO - Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal
JF - Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal
M1 - 103241
ER -